Skip to main content

Non-elegant programming solution

Here's the problem: I have a bot that uses motor B and an arm to lift a heavy item. The motor is powerful enough to lift the item. After the item is lifted, the bot program continues on its way (maybe moving forward or backwards or moving into a LOOP block with a sensor trigger.) The problem occurs after motor B completes its lifting motion. As soon as the program moves forward, the weight of the heavy object causes motor B to spin in the opposite direction (gravity, not powered) and the arm (and object) slowly lowers (sometimes quickly).

So my next solution was to put motor B's action in parallel with the rest of the graphical code. I created a branch off of the main one and put motor B there... but here's the next problem. I can either program motor B to spin (rotation or degrees) in an Unlimited fashion, BUT I must have something for motor B to lift the item against and then when it hits, keep applying upward force (motor B still running, but the motor isn't actually spinning). This might work, but I actually need the item held parallel to the floor and not being pushed against something to hold it... once again, doing it this way works until motor B finishes its rotation and then the heavy object lowers again to the ground.

My solution isn't elegant, but I figured it was worth sharing in case someone else encounters this problem. What I did was configure Motor B to spin 90 degrees (.25 rotations) and at that point the object is being held, parallel to the ground. I then inserted a LOOP block - inside the loop block is MOVE block for Motor B to spin down .1 rotation and then another MOVE block that has Motor B spin up .1 rotation... I set the LOOP to loop Forever, and it worked... the bot holds the object parallel to the floor... the .1 rotation up and down motion isn't even noticeable... but the solution is that the motor is quickly spinning up and down, up and down and never powers down for the object to sink down again.

Anyone have a better solution? I tried applying a MOVE block that stops Motor B (braking) after the initial Motor B block lifts the object, but I didn't think it would work... and it didn't. What is really needed is for the MOVE blocks to have a check box that says "After motion is completed, lock the motor" or something similar to keep the motor from spinning.

If anyone else has any ideas, please post them.

Popular posts from this blog

ROBOTMAK3RS Review: LEGO River Steamboat

I thought the LEGO River Steamboat would be an interesting set for a ROBOTMAK3R review for a few reasons. First, the LEGO designer of the model is Marina Stampoli, a long-time collaborator of the late ROBOTMAK3R Vassilis Chryssanthakopoulo s. From earlier collaborations with Vassilis, I  knew Marina was incredibly talented, with an eye for aesthetics and functionality. Her background in architecture is particularly useful for her relatively new position at LEGO. Her other sets include the Magic of Disney (21352), Message Board (41839), and Red London Telephone Box (21347). Second, watching Marina's reveal video  and reading her designer interview made this set even more tempting to build. The gearing mechanisms running through the model gave way to many opportunities for automation using LEGO robotics elements. Since ROBOTMAK3RS is all about adding interactivity and automation to LEGO brick, I thought it would be fun to see where and how LEGO robotics could be added to this s...

Celebrating 25 Years of MINDSTORMS

In celebration of the 25th Anniversary of MINDSTORMS, we take a trip through history. Please also visit ROBOTMAK3RS Community every week as we highlight different projects all through 2023 in celebration of the anniversary. Some of the early history is based on the content shared by  Coder Shah  in our  MINDSTORMS EV3 Community Group . Some of the text and links may have been edited from his original posts for consistency and clarity.  1984 - Kjeld Kirk Kristiansen watched a TV program called "Talking Turtle," where MIT professor Seymour Papert demonstrated how children could control robot "turtles" using LOGO, a programming language he developed. 1988 - The collaboration between MIT and LEGO resulted in LEGO TC Logo in 1988, which allowed students to control LEGO models using computer commands. The video shows Papert demonstrating TC Logo. 1990 - LEGO TC Logo was hampered since the robots you built had to be tethered to a personal computer. LEGO and MIT...

Ghostbusters R.T.V Remix

Nino Guba is from Torrance, California, USA. He played with LEGO as a kid, but growing up in the Philippines, it wasn’t something he had easy access to. He only got reintroduced to LEGO when he moved to the US and had kids of his own. When his sons were younger, they received LEGO sets as gifts, but as they grew older, the sets got put into storage as their interest faded. Fast forward a few years, he started coming up with his own product ideas and thought about how he could quickly prototype them. That’s when he discovered LEGO MINDSTORMS—and was hooked! He raided his kids’ old collection, got everything organized, and now he's designing and building his own creations, blending his coding skills with LEGO robotics to bring ideas to life. Tell us about your Ghostbusters Remote Trap Vehicle (R.T.V) project. This project is a LEGO Technic adaptation of the Ghostbusters R.T.V.—a ghost trap converted into a remote-controlled vehicle. Its companion build is a prop replica of the Futaba...