Skip to main content

NI Week – the Jedi Challenge

Last year at NI Week we had an on-the-spot challenge between several teams, which was a lot of fun. This year they did this again, with some fun twists and turns. First, the table was a huge colorful structure that a group from Ohio brought (driving it overland!). With room to run four robots head-to-head (each in their own separate area), I think this greatly improved the entertainment value for the spectators (it also provided a semi-controlled “robot arena” the rest of the time, which was great fun for all), as well as making it tough to guess in advance just what the challenge would be. The robots were also more complex, with a Hitechnic color sensor facing forward and a downward facing light sensor, they were clearly able to not just line follow (but which line?!?) but identify what color object was in front of them. And perhaps most interesting, they had an elegantly designed “tweezers” on the front using the third motor, one that would close two long axles together, and then tilt back to lift whatever might be caught between them. I’m not sure who designed this mechanism, but it would have made a great example to show a lot of other folks. It not only illustrated studless construction very well, but also how to get two motions out of one motor – when the two long axles can no longer close, the now blocked gear train would then crank up at an angle, lifting whatever was in the “tweezers” (I wish I would have gotten better pictures of this… anyone?).

The actual challenge was to try to grab as many “Jedi starfighters” (barbell-shaped structures of red or blue bricks... kind of a squarish TIE fighter resting on one side) as possible within a short period of time, collecting them from a common area (the red "barbell" in the rear of this picture) and placing the red ones in one area (where the closer red “barbell” is in this photo), and the blue ones (not shown) in a nearby area, thus sorting them into two colors. We even had Leia and Yoda hosting (with a very entertaining running commentary). Teams were pairs of folks, in some cases one of the MCP paired up with a random person pulled from the audience (including kids). We had a short time to try to program our robots to drive down the entrance ramp, pick up a “fighter”, and deposit it in the “rebel base”. The picture shows what's more or less a starting set-up, but with one red "barbell" in the drop-off zone so it shows up clearly.

The results were interesting. Almost no one got line following to work well in the time allotted (my team did use line following, with some success, to find the pick-up point, but never quite got a perfect drop). Most teams ended up using dead-reckoning, which lived up to it’s name – in the short bit of time we had, it was extremely tough to get it reliably right and fast at the same time. Steve Hassenplug had the novel approach of coming down the ramp backwards, which helped some… but in the end even he didn’t quite get the reliability licked in the time allotted (although shortly after the official event, he had very good luck with his programming).

All in all, a really good time, with a lot of the crowd enjoying the event as well as watching the frantic programming.

I just wish I had gotten better documentation of the really nifty little rovers Laura was building for this challenge. I never seem to get enough pictures…

--
Brian Davis

Popular posts from this blog

MINDSTORMS Retires!

2023 is the 25th Anniversary of the MINDSTORMS brand. For 25 years, MINDSTORMS has educated and inspired a generation of robot builders, both children and adults. Unfortunately, the LEGO Group decided to end the line on December 2022. Many ROBOTMAK3RS have been passionately involved with the development of MINDSTORMS through the MUP and MCP programs. Even with the newest Robot Inventor line, several ROBOTMAK3RS were invited to submit additional bonus models that were included in the official app. Regardless of the retirement of a major LEGO robotics product line, ROBOTMAK3RS continue to MAKE-SHARE-INSPIRE using all LEGO robotics platforms available to us. Here is the official statement from LEGO. Since its launch in September 1998, LEGO MINDSTORMS has been one of the core ‘Build & Code’ experiences in the company’s portfolio, carrying with it significant brand equity and becoming a stand-out experience for the early days of consumer robotics and leading to current Build & Code

Celebrating 25 Years of MINDSTORMS

In celebration of the 25th Anniversary of MINDSTORMS, we take a trip through history. Please also visit ROBOTMAK3RS Community every week as we highlight different projects all through 2023 in celebration of the anniversary. Some of the early history is based on the content shared by  Coder Shah  in our  MINDSTORMS EV3 Community Group . Some of the text and links may have been edited from his original posts for consistency and clarity.  1984 - Kjeld Kirk Kristiansen watched a TV program called "Talking Turtle," where MIT professor Seymour Papert demonstrated how children could control robot "turtles" using LOGO, a programming language he developed. 1988 - The collaboration between MIT and LEGO resulted in LEGO TC Logo in 1988, which allowed students to control LEGO models using computer commands. The video shows Papert demonstrating TC Logo. 1990 - LEGO TC Logo was hampered since the robots you built had to be tethered to a personal computer. LEGO and MIT

Celebrating MINDSTORMS with a Remix Part 1

In honor of the 25th Anniversary of MINDSTORMS, we asked ROBOTMAK3RS to combine a LEGO set of their choice with a MINDSTORMS set. Here is what these five ROBOTMAK3RS came up with.  MINDSTORMS Chess Assistant by Arvind Seshan Overview: When you are new to chess, it can be a challenge to remember which pieces go where. Now, you can use machine learning and LEGO MINDSTORMS Robot Inventor to build a tool to help you learn where all the chess pieces go on the chess board. Sets used: LEGO® Iconic Chess Set (40174) and MINDSTORMS Robot Inventor (51515) Review: I really like how the chess set base can store all the pieces underneath and that the board neatly splits in half for handy storage. The chess pieces themselves are very sturdy and well built. My only criticism is the building of the box itself. It was quite difficult to see what pieces to use and since the entire box is made mostly of thin plates, it took a lot of time and patience. I would have liked the storage area to be sliding dra