Skip to main content

NXTLog Sumo, The Finalists

Some more information from the NXTlog Sumo contest is up, including a picture of the "on deck" area and the actual results of the competition, heat-by-heat. As you can see, MG_sumo by mpego beat all comers, including a rematch against the robot it first came up against, Wedge Bot. For those who might not have seen it before, the style was a double elimination: if the robot lost a match in the first bracket (the upper tree in the diagram), it was entered in the 2nd bracket, for a second shot at the title. That way there were no eliminations due to a single "lucky match", and everybody had a second chance. The list of robots is linked to their NXTlog entries (with .rbt and LDD files), so if you like you can build your own version just like the Robotics Posse did and test your creation against the "best of the best" from the NXTlog event.

I'd actually recommend looking over the entries of the 29 finalists for at least two reasons. First, there are a wide variety of strategies and building techniques in the list - they're not all perfect (& some of them didn't work, I'm certain, as intended), but there's a lot to learn from other people's designs. Second, these represent some well-documented robots on NXTlog, which was very important in this contest - after all, if the judges couldn't build them, they couldn't test them. And if the program didn't function, they couldn't run them. Testing I suspect was critical, as some of the programs I looked over clearly either hadn't completely understood the rules (no three second delay was a common problem), or hadn't tested the robot (the program, as written, just didn't work).

Some of the robot were remarkably simple, durable, and functional - DozerBot by LEgoFan65536 was a good example, and a lot of us just picked it up and looked at it due to the contstruction (OK, and the fact that it looked kinda "cute"). Some, like Intelligent Sumo by rjbsfarm, were a blast to watch even if they didn't do quite as well as intended (here, Intelligent Sumo did pretty much what it was supposed to, but couldn't run fast enough to avoid some of the more aggressive opponents. It's also a great example of documentation without an LDD file - the pictures were clear, ordered, and made construction possible. I've got some video of it going against Not-So-Blind-Bandit that is just great, I'll try to get some together later. Not-So-Blind-Bandit by poetryinmotion used a novel sound-based system that didn't seem to function perfectly for detecting the opponent, but it was well-tested and stayed on the ring even when it missed its opponent, allowing it to do fairly well (John Brost built this one at home, so it had by far the nicest color scheme of the day, a red-&-NXT-white shell that just made it a nice looking robot overall). And then there were some that while they had a cool weapon, like NXTardigrade nosepuncher sumo, it didn't function well in the ring... but we had a great time retasking it to punch Jay in the nose repeatedly :).

Hopefully some of us or LEGO will be able to pull together the time to put up some video soon. We do have some, it just takes time to edit it... and it's a lot of fun to watch.

--
Brian Davis

Popular posts from this blog

MINDSTORMS Retires!

2023 is the 25th Anniversary of the MINDSTORMS brand. For 25 years, MINDSTORMS has educated and inspired a generation of robot builders, both children and adults. Unfortunately, the LEGO Group decided to end the line on December 2022. Many ROBOTMAK3RS have been passionately involved with the development of MINDSTORMS through the MUP and MCP programs. Even with the newest Robot Inventor line, several ROBOTMAK3RS were invited to submit additional bonus models that were included in the official app. Regardless of the retirement of a major LEGO robotics product line, ROBOTMAK3RS continue to MAKE-SHARE-INSPIRE using all LEGO robotics platforms available to us. Here is the official statement from LEGO. Since its launch in September 1998, LEGO MINDSTORMS has been one of the core ‘Build & Code’ experiences in the company’s portfolio, carrying with it significant brand equity and becoming a stand-out experience for the early days of consumer robotics and leading to current Build & Code

Celebrating 25 Years of MINDSTORMS

In celebration of the 25th Anniversary of MINDSTORMS, we take a trip through history. Please also visit ROBOTMAK3RS Community every week as we highlight different projects all through 2023 in celebration of the anniversary. Some of the early history is based on the content shared by  Coder Shah  in our  MINDSTORMS EV3 Community Group . Some of the text and links may have been edited from his original posts for consistency and clarity.  1984 - Kjeld Kirk Kristiansen watched a TV program called "Talking Turtle," where MIT professor Seymour Papert demonstrated how children could control robot "turtles" using LOGO, a programming language he developed. 1988 - The collaboration between MIT and LEGO resulted in LEGO TC Logo in 1988, which allowed students to control LEGO models using computer commands. The video shows Papert demonstrating TC Logo. 1990 - LEGO TC Logo was hampered since the robots you built had to be tethered to a personal computer. LEGO and MIT

Celebrating MINDSTORMS with a Remix Part 1

In honor of the 25th Anniversary of MINDSTORMS, we asked ROBOTMAK3RS to combine a LEGO set of their choice with a MINDSTORMS set. Here is what these five ROBOTMAK3RS came up with.  MINDSTORMS Chess Assistant by Arvind Seshan Overview: When you are new to chess, it can be a challenge to remember which pieces go where. Now, you can use machine learning and LEGO MINDSTORMS Robot Inventor to build a tool to help you learn where all the chess pieces go on the chess board. Sets used: LEGO® Iconic Chess Set (40174) and MINDSTORMS Robot Inventor (51515) Review: I really like how the chess set base can store all the pieces underneath and that the board neatly splits in half for handy storage. The chess pieces themselves are very sturdy and well built. My only criticism is the building of the box itself. It was quite difficult to see what pieces to use and since the entire box is made mostly of thin plates, it took a lot of time and patience. I would have liked the storage area to be sliding dra